DoJ & SEC Charge Crypto Market Makers with Manipulation in Digital Assets

3 min read

DoJ, SEC charge ‘crypto’ market makers with market manipulation

DoJ and SEC Take Action Against Cryptocurrency Market Manipulation

A group of cryptocurrency market makers (MMs) has been charged with engaging in fraudulent activities and manipulating the market by artificially inflating the price of several memecoins, including Bitcoin (BTC). On October 9, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District of Massachusetts revealed charges against 14 individuals and four companies for their involvement in extensive fraud and manipulation within the cryptocurrency market. The authorities have confiscated over $25 million worth of tokens and various trading bots linked to wash trading practices, while roughly 60 tokens have been rendered inactive. This operation, dubbed Token Mirrors, was supported by multiple agencies, including the FBI and the IRS’s Criminal Investigation unit, along with international cooperation from authorities in Portugal and the UK. Four companies—Lillian Finance, Robo Inu Finance, Saitama, and VZZM—were identified as crypto firms involved in issuing and promoting these tokens. The MMs—Gotbit Consulting, CLS Global FZC, MyTrade MM, and ZM Quant—are accused of inflating trading volumes to create a false sense of retail interest to attract genuine investors, only to later offload these devalued assets onto unsuspecting buyers. Alarmingly, three of the MMs—CLS Global, MyTrade, and ZM Quant—are alleged to have engaged in wash trading involving a token created by the FBI specifically for the purpose of manipulation. If found guilty, the accused individuals could face decades in prison for charges related to market manipulation, fraud, and conspiracy.

Implications of the Indictments on the Crypto Market

While the indictments primarily focus on the lesser-known memecoins, they also highlight troubling instances of Bitcoin’s trading volume being artificially inflated by a staggering 16 times its actual volume. This revelation may disturb Bitcoin enthusiasts who believe their asset is immune to such fraudulent activities, but it underscores the ongoing issues within the speculative token sector. The centralized exchanges that allowed these MMs to operate unchecked have a history of controversial practices, further solidifying their negative reputations in light of these indictments.

Gotbit’s Involvement in Market Manipulation

The indictment against Gotbit outlines that the Belize-based company offered seemingly legitimate services while secretly providing illegal market manipulation tactics. In early 2022, executives from Gotbit, along with associates from Robo Inu, established a private chatroom on Telegram. Discussions within this chatroom exposed plans to artificially increase trading volume for the Robo Inu token, with intentions to create the illusion of organic demand. Gotbit was instructed to maintain gradual volume increases to avoid detection by tracking platforms like CoinMarketCap. Further communications revealed ongoing strategies to create a sense of urgency among potential investors, while also discussing the need for confidentiality regarding their manipulative agreements. A contract was drafted stipulating Gotbit’s responsibilities for the manipulation in exchange for payments and a percentage of profits. An FBI affidavit from 2019 disclosed that Gotbit’s founder had previously acknowledged their engagement in volume manipulation and exhibited no concern for repercussions, citing the absence of specific crypto regulations in Russia.

The Saitama Token Manipulation Scheme

Gotbit’s manipulation tactics extended to the Saitama token on various exchanges, elevating its market cap significantly. Evidence from Telegram messages in July 2021 showed Saitama’s management strategizing to create a façade of increased buying activity to generate hype and attract more investors. By 2023, Saitama was again collaborating with Gotbit to inflate its token value, while its executives profited handsomely by selling their holdings to unsuspecting retail investors. In a May 2024 meeting with undercover FBI agents posing as crypto investors, an employee from the exchange LBank confirmed the potential for MMs to artificially inflate trading volumes.

Insights from ZM Quant’s Activities

The indictment against ZM Quant Investment, based in the British Virgin Islands, reveals its connections to the same individuals and companies implicated in other manipulative schemes. The Department of Justice reported that ZM Quant earned over $3 million within two years by enhancing trading volumes for various tokens on centralized exchanges. A staff member at ZM Quant shared insider information about manipulation practices not disclosed publicly. In March 2024, they described how easily tokens could be pumped using numerous wallets to simulate trading activity, making it appear more attractive to genuine investors.

CLS Global’s Role in Creating False Demand

CLS Global, operating from the UAE, was also implicated in the manipulative practices. Through contacts with undercover agents, CLS offered algorithms to create artificial trading volume that mimicked organic buying and selling. One of their representatives candidly admitted to understanding the implications of wash trading, acknowledging that their goal was to generate FOMO among potential investors. CLS boasted about previous successes in getting tokens listed on major exchanges, ultimately contributing to the market manipulation scheme.

MyTrade’s Deceptive Practices

MyTrade, another entity implicated in the scheme, operated openly regarding its manipulation services, offering clients the ability to dictate daily trading volumes through automated bots. The founder boasted about their methods to facilitate pump-and-dump schemes, framing their actions as necessary to create trading activity in a largely stagnant market. On a single day, MyTrade reportedly executed millions of dollars in wash trades for numerous clients before law enforcement intervened to halt their activities.

Consequences and the Bigger Picture

Some individuals involved in these schemes have already pleaded guilty, while others remain beyond the reach of U.S. authorities. This case illustrates the ongoing challenges within the cryptocurrency space, where short-term profit motives often overshadow the foundational ideals of blockchain technology. Recent discussions have also surfaced regarding the real identity of Bitcoin’s creator, Satoshi Nakamoto, emphasizing the disconnect between the original vision for cryptocurrency and the current landscape plagued by manipulation and fraud. As the industry grapples with these issues, it’s crucial for investors to remain vigilant and informed, resisting the temptations of deceptive practices that could undermine their financial well-being.